<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>LegalMandA</title>
      <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/</link>
      <description>A discussion about the legal issues that relate to mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A) of businesses.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:49:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.34</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Today&apos;s M&amp;A News</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Another bank merger in the offing . . . Two Maryland banks have a </span><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/060731/20060731005686.html?.v=1" style="font-family: Verdana;">announced</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> a deal. Bradford Bancorp of Baltimore, Maryland will acquire Valley Bancorp of Hunt Valley, Maryland in a transaction worth $9.6 million.</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Two telecom companies are merging. That doesn't sound like news, does it? Cleartel Communications </span><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060731/flm009.html?.v=57" style="font-family: Verdana;">announced</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> its intent to acquire Supra Telecom. Both offer telecommunication services in South Florida. Terms of the deal were not disclosed.</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">A big deal in the branded meats business has been </span><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060731/smithfield_foods_conagra_foods.html?.v=3" style="font-family: Verdana;">announced</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;">. Smithfield Foods will &quot;acquire most assets of the branded meats business of ConAgra Foods for about $575 million in cash and stock.&quot;</span></font></p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/todays_ma_news_5.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/todays_ma_news_5.html</guid>
<category>Merger news</category><category>2.0</category><category>Merger news</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:49:44 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Today&apos;s M&amp;A News</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">According to this Bloomberg </span><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aDID66hyoSo4&amp;refer=home" style="font-family: Verdana;">article</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;">, HCA Inc. will be bought out by Bain Capital LLC, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp; Co.,Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. and HCA co-founder Thomas F. Frist Jr. The total value of the buyout is $33 billion, representing the largest buyout in U.S. history.</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The semiconductor industry is abuzz with rumors of a possible deal involving Royal Philips Electronics NV. This </span><a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/15111672.htm" style="font-family: Verdana;">article</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> reports &quot;that private equity firms may be willing to pay around 8 billion euros ($10.1 billion) for the company's semiconductor division.&quot; This division manufactures &quot;chips for mobile phones, mp3 players, televisions and cars.&quot;</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">In other news, AMD intends to buy ATI Technologies Inc. for $5.4 billion. ATI makes graphics chips. According to this AP </span><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060724/amd_acquisition.html?.v=13" style="font-family: Verdana;">article</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;">, the &quot;acquisition would instantly turn AMD into a leading supplier of graphics chips, which render images for computer games and Internet video, and so-called chipsets, which connect a PC's processor to other system components.&quot; The deal will intensify the AMD-Intel rivalry, as Intel also supplies graphics chips.</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><br style="font-family: Verdana;" /></font></p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/todays_ma_news_3.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/todays_ma_news_3.html</guid>
<category>Buyouts</category><category>Hospitals</category><category>Semiconductors</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:30:17 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>FTC Clears Linde AG/The BOC Group plc Deal, Subject to Divestitures</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The Federal Trade Commission </span><a style="font-family: Verdana;" href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2006/07/lindeBOC.htm">announced</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> its decision to challenge Linde AG&rsquo;s proposed $14.4 billion acquisition of The BOC Group plc. The FTC&rsquo;s </span><a style="font-family: Verdana;" href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0610114/0610114LindeBOCComplaint.pdf">complaint</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> alleges that the acquisition as originally structured would have increased the likelihood that customers would be forced to pay higher prices for liquid oxygen, liquid nitrogen, and bulk refined helium in certain markets. </span></font></p>
<p style="font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2">Linde AG settled, agreeing to sell air separation units and other assets related to the production of liquid oxygen and nitrogen in eight locations across the United States. Linde also must sell bulk refined helium assets, including helium source contracts, distribution assets, and customer contracts to Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corporation.<br /></font></p>
<p style="font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2">To learn more, read the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0610114/0610114LindeBOCDO-PublicRecordVersion.pdf">Decision and Order</a> and the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0610114/0610114LindeBOCAnalysis.pdf">Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Orders to Aid Public Comment</a>.<br /></font></p>
<p><br style="font-family: Verdana;" /></p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/ftc_clears_linde_agthe_boc_gro.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/ftc_clears_linde_agthe_boc_gro.html</guid>
<category>Divestitures</category><category>FTC</category><category>2.0</category><category>Divestitures</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:14:05 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>FTC Requires Divestiture in Deal Closed in 2005</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2">Today, the FTC <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2006/07/hologic.htm">announced</a> that it will challenge Hologic Inc.&rsquo;s 2005 purchase of the breast cancer screening and diagnosis business of Fischer Imaging Corporation. In its complaint, the FTC alleged that Hologic&rsquo;s acquisition of Fischer&rsquo;s prone stereotactic breast biopsy systems (SBBSs) business harmed American consumers by eliminating its only significant competitor for the sale of SBBSs in the United States.</font></p>
<p style="font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2">Hologic paid $32 million for Fischer&rsquo;s intellectual property and other assets in September 2005. The assets related to Fischer's mammography and breast biopsy businesses, including patents, trademarks, and customer and vendor lists for Fischer&rsquo;s prone SBBS product, MammoTest. At the time, Fischer was Hologic&rsquo;s only significant competitor in the U.S. market for prone SBBSs. As a result of the acquisition, Fischer relinquished all of its rights to develop, market, and sell prone SBBSs in the United States. According the government's <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0510263/0510263complaint.pdf">complaint</a>, the deal gave Hologic a &quot;a virtual monopoly in the U.S. prone SBBS market.&quot;</font></p>
<p style="font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2">Because this deal was worth less than the $56.7 million filing threshold under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Premerger Notification Act (HSR Act), it was not reportable to the federal antitrust agencies. The FTC nevertheless learned of it--likely as a result of a customer complaint--and challenged it anyway.&nbsp; Hologic must now divest itself of the assets, which it has <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0510263/0510263agreement.pdf">agreed</a> to do. Siemens AG will buy the assets.</font></p>]]><p><a href="http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/ftc_requires_divestiture_in_de.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/ftc_requires_divestiture_in_de.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/ftc_requires_divestiture_in_de.html</guid>
<category>Divestitures</category><category>FTC</category><category>2.0</category><category>Divestitures</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Today&apos;s M&amp;A News</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The Wall Street Journal's </span><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law" style="font-family: Verdana;"> Law Blog</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> is reporting that Judge Emmet Sullivan appears to be uncomfortable with the settlements reached by the U.S. Department of Justice in connection with two telecom mergers, SBC-AT&amp;T and Verizon-MCI.  According to the post, </span><a href=" " style="font-family: Verdana;">Federal Judge Questions Two Telecom Mega-Mergers</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;">, Judge Sullivan issued an order observing that the two mergers &quot;appear to be against public interest given the apparent loss in competition.&quot; Whether he will believes that the proposed settlements adequately address that loss remains to be seen.  </span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">According to Reuters, the FTC has announced that National Grid Plc may close its acquisition of KeySpan Corp. The article appears </span><a href="http://today.reuters.com/stocks/QuoteCompanyNewsArticle.aspx?view=CN&amp;storyID=2006-07-10T130903Z_01_WAT006018_RTRIDST_0_ENERGY-KEYSPAN-ANTITRUST-URGENT.XML&amp;rpc=66" style="font-family: Verdana;">here</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;">. Reuters also </span><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/060710/property_kimco_panpacific.html?.v=7" style="font-family: Verdana;">reports</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> that Kimco Realty Corp., which buys, develops, and operates shopping centers, intends to acquire Pan Pacific Retail Properties Inc. for $2.9 billion.</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Mittal Steel Co. will not acquire &quot;the outstanding minority stakes of Arcelor's two Brazilian subsidiaries&quot; when it takes over Arcelor, according to this AP </span><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060710/mittal_steel_arcelor_brazil.html?.v=1" style="font-family: Verdana;">story</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;">. Lastly, OnWafer&reg; Technologies </span><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060710/sfm061.html?.v=58" style="font-family: Verdana;">announced</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> today it has acquired the Plasma Management Division from Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.</span></font></p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/todays_ma_news_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/todays_ma_news_1.html</guid>
<category>Energy</category><category>Merger news</category><category>2.0</category><category>Merger news</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:57:48 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>AT&amp;T/Cingular Deal Subject of Class Action Suit</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights has filed a class action suit against AT&amp;T and Cingular. Cingular </span><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060707/cingular_lawsuit.html?.v=5" style="font-family: Verdana;">denies</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> all wrongdoing, accusing the Foundation's lawyer of making &quot;false and misleading statements.&quot;</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The Foundation's </span><a href="http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporate/rp/6540.pdf" style="font-family: Verdana;">complaint</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> attacks AT&amp;T and Cingular's post-merger conduct. It alleges: &quot;Cingular deliberately schemed to dismantle the AT&amp;T Wireless network so as to diminish and degrade the service provided to AT&amp;T Wireless customers.&quot; The scheme was intended &quot;to induce AT&amp;T Wireless customers into 'transferring' from their AT&amp;T Wireless plan to a Cingular plan,&quot; which allegedly offers &quot;less favorable terms.&quot;&nbsp; According to the complaint, consumers have suffered due to &quot;diminished service in the form of dropped calls as well as poor or no reception in areas where they previously received adequate reception.&quot;</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The complaint asserts claims for breach of contract and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment/common law restitution, and violations of various states' unfair and deceptive acts and practices statutes. The Foundation filed it in the federal district court sitting in Seattle.&nbsp;</span></font></p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/attcingular_deal_subject_of_cl.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/attcingular_deal_subject_of_cl.html</guid>
<category>Telecommunications</category><category>2.0</category><category>Telecommunications</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Today&apos;s M&amp;A News</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Italy's antitrust authority will investigate the 2002 acquisition by Electricite de France and AEM SpA's of the controlling interest in Edison SpA.&nbsp; The agency's investigation will focus on whether the acquisition violates &quot;</span><a href="http://www.iii.co.uk/news/?type=afxnews&amp;articleid=5706247&amp;subject=economic&amp;action=article" style="font-family: Verdana;">rules limiting state ownership of certain electricity generators</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;">.'</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">In other </span><a href="http://www.iii.co.uk/news/?type=afxnews&amp;articleid=5704459&amp;subject=companies&amp;action=article" style="font-family: Verdana;">news</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> from Italy, the acquisition of Fonti del Vulture by Coca-Cola Co. and&nbsp; Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company has been cleared by Italy's antitrust agency.&nbsp; The European Commission cleared the deal last year--subject to conditions. Italy's clearance is subject to the same conditions.</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Deal-makers targeting Chinese companies will find this news discouraging. According to </span><a href="http://www.newkerala.com/news3.php?action=fullnews&amp;id=19433" style="font-family: Verdana;">China looking closely at foreign mergers, acquisitions</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;">, &quot;China's ministry of commerce plans to keep a close watch on foreign mergers and acquisitions in important sectors to ensure the country's industrial and economic integrity.&quot; This &quot;close watch&quot; has resulted in the delay of the proposed acquisition of the Xugong Group, China's biggest construction machinery manufacturer, by American-based Carlyle Group.</span></font></p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/todays_ma_news.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/07/todays_ma_news.html</guid>
<category>Italy</category><category>2.0</category><category>Italy</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:13:24 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Divestiture Required in Newspaper Deal</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The U.S. Department of Justice today </span><a style="font-family: Verdana;" href="http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2006/216876.htm">announced</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> that it will require The McClatchy Company and Knight Ridder Inc. to </span></font><font size="2" face="arial" style="font-family: Verdana;">divest the <i>St.            Paul Pioneer Press</i> in order to proceed with their proposed multi-billion            dollar<b> </b>newspaper merger. The Department said that the            transaction, as originally proposed, would have eliminated head-to-head            competition between McClatchy and Knight Ridder and likely would have            resulted in higher prices for advertisers and readers in the Minneapolis/St.            Paul metropolitan area.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="arial" style="font-family: Verdana;">The government's <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f216800/216877.htm">complaint</a> alleges that McClatchy's <span style="font-style: italic;">Star Tribune</span> competes directly against Knight Ridder's <span style="font-style: italic;">St. Paul Pioneer Press</span> for advertisers in the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul and surrounding areas. The parties have agreed to make the divestiture. To learn more about this deal and the DOJ's analysis, read the <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f216800/216878.htm">Competitive Impact Statement</a>.</font></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/06/divestiture_required_in_newspa.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/06/divestiture_required_in_newspa.html</guid>
<category>Divestitures</category><category>2.0</category><category>Divestitures</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:17:31 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Deal News</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2">Euronext and NYSE--a done deal that will create &quot;the first transatlantic stock exchange. Read more <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060602/bs_nm/financial_euronext_dc_5">here</a>.<br /></font></p>
<p style="font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2">The <a href="http://today.reuters.com/investing/financeArticle.aspx?type=mergersNews&amp;storyID=2006-06-02T141658Z_01_N02178467_RTRIDST_0_HEALTH-GLYCOFI-ANTITRUST.XML">FTC</a> has signed off on Merck's proposed $400 million acquisition of GlycoFi Inc. GlycoFi is a biotech company, focusing on yeast glycoengineering. Wonder what that is . . .</font></p>
<p style="font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2">Those of you interested in EU deals should check out Reuters' <a href="http://today.reuters.com/business/newsarticle.aspx?type=CHMMFG&amp;storyid=2006-06-02T153744Z_01_PRWP14_RTRIDST_0_EU-MERGERS-AND-TAKEOVERS-JUNE-2.XML&amp;WTmodLoc=BizArt-R1-IndustryNews-4">EU mergers and takeovers (June 2)</a>.</font><font size="2"> This is a great guide to mergers under review in the EU. Also included is &quot;a brief guide to the EU merger process.&quot;</font></p>
<p style="font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2">Whoever is bidding for Pfizer's consumer healthcare business, it's not Bayer. Reuters has more <a href="http://today.reuters.com/business/newsArticle.aspx?type=ousiv&amp;storyid=2006-06-03T102855Z_01_L03720237_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESSPRO-PFIZER-BAYER-DC.XML&amp;WTmodLoc=BizArt-R2-MostViewedBiz-3">here</a>.</font>  </p>]]><p><a href="http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/06/deal_news.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/06/deal_news.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/06/deal_news.html</guid>
<category>Merger news</category><category>2.0</category><category>Merger news</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 16:21:22 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>In the News</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The Federal Reserve has </span><a style="font-family: Verdana;" href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060525/banco_santander_sovereign.html?.v=1">approved</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> a plan by Spanish bank, Banco Santander Central Hispano S.A. to buy approximately 25% of Sovereign Bancorp., which owns Sovereign Bank and Independence Community Bank. Independence Community Bank is based in New York. In approving the deal, the agency noted that the transaction &quot;would not result in any significantly adverse effect on competition or the concentration of banking resources in the New York banking market&nbsp;or in any other relevant banking market.&quot;</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">In other news, JDA Software and Manugistics </span><a style="font-family: Verdana;" href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060525/jda_software_manugistics.html?.v=1">announced</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> that they have been granted early termination of the HSR waiting period. The transaction must be approved by Manugistics shareholders.</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Finally, funeral-services companies, Service Corporation International and Alderwoods Group, Inc., </span><a style="font-family: Verdana;" href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060525/dath036.html?.v=45">announced</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> that the FTC has sent them each a Request for Additional Information a/k/a a Second Request. Canada's Competition Bureau also is investigating the transaction.</span></font></p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/in_the_news.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/in_the_news.html</guid>
<category>FTC</category><category>2.0</category><category>FTC</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 23:45:14 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Contentious Deals in the News</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Italian antitrust watchdog will investigate Alitalia SpA's acquisition of Volare, a low-cost airline in Italy. The agency is concerned that the deal &quot;could constitute or strengthen a dominant position in some air transport markets.&quot; According to this Forbes <a href="http://www.forbes.com/business/feeds/afx/2006/05/25/afx2773717.html">article</a>, the agency's investigation will focus on six domestic routes.<br /><br />There've been more <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/719513.html">developments</a> on the Dor Alon/Sonol merger, a deal that would combine two Israeli energy companies.&nbsp; Dor Alon is proposing to sell 70 of its gas stations to Oil Refineries for $51 million. This deal could ameliorate the concerns that Israel's antitrust authority has about the Dor Alon/Sonol merger, which it has refused to approve.<br /><br />Stewart &amp; Stevenson Services, Inc. and Armor Holdings, Inc. have <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060525/flth012.html?.v=56">completed</a> their merger, much to the chagrin of Oshkosh Truck Corporation.&nbsp; As reported <a href="http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/texas_court_rebuffs_disgruntle.html">here</a> yesterday, Oshkosh filed several lawsuits in hope of stopping this deal. Better luck next time, eh?</p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/contentious_deals_in_the_news.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/contentious_deals_in_the_news.html</guid>
<category>Defense contractors</category><category>Energy</category><category>Italy</category><category>Merger news</category><category>2.0</category><category>Italy</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 11:59:23 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Texas Court Rebuffs Disgruntled Rival Suitor</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2">Oshkosh Truck Corporation has lost yet another court battle in connection with its bid to acquire Stewart &amp; Stevenson Services, Inc., a defense contractor.&nbsp; Concluding that a deal with Oshkosh would raise significant antitrust concerns, Stewart &amp; Stevenson decided to merge with Armor Holdings Inc. instead.</font></p>
<p style="font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2">Not content to let this one go, Oshkosh filed suit in federal court. It argued that Stewart &amp; Stevenson's management &quot;failed to uphold their responsibilities to shareholders&quot; by rejecting Oshkosh's higher bid in favor of Armor's competing offer. A federal judge <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/stories/2006/05/08/daily23.html?from_rss=1">dismissed</a> the case.</font></p>
<p style="font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2">Oshkosh decided to try its luck in Texas state court. It lost--again. Acccording to a <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060524/nyw157.html?.v=52">press release</a> issued by Stewart &amp; Stevenson, the court denied Oshkosh's request for a temporary restraining order to postpone Stewart &amp; Stevenson's special shareholder meeting. At the shareholder meeting, which proceeds tomorrow, shareholders will vote on Stewart &amp; Stevenson's cash merger with Armor Holdings.</font></p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/texas_court_rebuffs_disgruntle.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/texas_court_rebuffs_disgruntle.html</guid>
<category>Defense contractors</category><category>2.0</category><category>Defense contractors</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:29:35 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Could we be heading toward the first-ever transatlantic stock exchange?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">It sure looks that way.&nbsp; According to the AP's </span><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060523/nyse_euronext.html?.v=8" style="font-family: Verdana;">Euronext Holders Give Boost to NYSE Bid</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;">, &quot;shareholders of European stock-exchange operator Euronext rejected a proposal Tuesday to commit in principle to a takeover by Deutsche Boerse Group, giving a boost to a rival bid from the New York Stock Exchange.&quot;</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Euronext operates the Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam, and Lisbon stock exchanges.&nbsp; NYSE bid 7.8 billion euros or $10.2 billion for Euronext; Deutsche Boerse Group, which operates a German stock exchange, bid approximately 8.2 billion euros or $11 billion.&nbsp; Though smaller, Euronext shareholders might find NYSE's bid more attractive because it includes more cash and would require the combined entity to carry less debt.</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Euronext's boards recommended the NYSE bid to shareholders.&nbsp; Antitrust concerns may be playing a role here.&nbsp; If Euronext merges with Deutsche Boerse, the deal &quot;would create a single market covering much of Europe.&quot;&nbsp; Such a deal likely would receive intense scrutiny from Europe's top antitrust authority whereas a deal between Euronext and NYSE likely would sail right through the regulatory process.</span></font></p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/could_we_be_heading_toward_the.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/could_we_be_heading_toward_the.html</guid>
<category>International</category><category>Merger news</category><category>2.0</category><category>International</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 11:01:41 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>A Merger Challenge in Poland?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Increasingly, we're seeing overseas antitrust authorities stepping up their merger enforcement efforts.&nbsp; Take Poland, for instance.&nbsp; The Polish Anti-Monopoly refused to approve a deal between two producers of flavored vodka.&nbsp; The agency declined to approve the deal after concluding that the combined entity's market share would exceed 52%, 12% higher than the 40% threshold generally used by the agency when approving mergers.</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Refusing to give up, the parties have decided to fight.&nbsp; According to this </span><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060523/phtu031.html?.v=54" style="font-family: Verdana;">press release</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;">, Central European Distribution Corporation has filed an appeal with the Polish Anti-Monopoly office.&nbsp; The company disputes the agency's findings with respect to market share, although its press release notes that it is the &quot;largest vodka producer in Poland by value.&quot;</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">We'll have to wait and see how this one plays out, but acquisitive companies can learn something from this dispute.&nbsp; The most obvious lesson--the FTC, DOJ, and EU are not the only game in town when it comes to merger enforcement.&nbsp; The other&nbsp; lesson--plan for the worst.&nbsp; In an environment in which any one of dozens of antitrust agencies around the world can challenge a merger, companies must plan for all contingencies including the possibility of a merger challenge from a country that only recently established an antitrust regime.</span></font></p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/a_merger_challenge_in_poland.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/a_merger_challenge_in_poland.html</guid>
<category>International</category><category>2.0</category><category>International</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 09:57:34 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Delaware Chancery Court Issues Opinion in Merger Case</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog has an interesting post on a recent opinion issued by the Delware Chancery Court.&nbsp; The case involves a &quot;squeeze-out merger of a closely-held private company.&quot;</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The opinion in </span><a href="http://www.delawarelitigation.com/DEOPENMRI.pdf" style="font-family: Verdana;">Delaware Open MRI Radiology Associates, P.A. v. Kessler</a><span style="font-family: Verdana;">, which is 86 pages long, addresses &quot;whether the minority stockholders of Delaware Open MRI Radiology Associates, P.A. (&ldquo;Delaware Radiology&rdquo;) received fair value in a squeeze-out merger with an acquisition vehicle of the majority stockholders, Delaware Open Acquisition, P.A. (&ldquo;Delaware Acquisition&rdquo;).&quot;&nbsp; The court concluded that the merger price was not fair, finding that the merger price was less than half of what it should have been.</span></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">As Francis G.X. Pileggi explains, the opinion &quot;is a veritable reference text for the analysis of fair price and valuation of closely-held businesses.&quot;&nbsp; Also significant is that the court rejected the testimony of the both parties' valuation experts, choosing instead to use &quot;its own independent valuation determination.&quot;&nbsp; Read both the opinion and Francis' take on it to learn more.</span></font></p>]]>	</description>
         <link>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/delaware_chancery_court_issues.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.legalmanda.com/2006/05/delaware_chancery_court_issues.html</guid>
<category>Closely-held corporations</category><category>Valuation</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 12:00:16 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
